QUOTE (Jaidelm @ Oct 28 2009, 07:36 AM)

I'm going to skip the normal rant, and just ask you to watch this and please tell me where I went wrong. It looked like I was dominating up until I got steamrolled.
Click to view attachmentAnd don't tell me "he had a bigger economy". The vast majority of this game was 2 base P on 3 base Z, at one point I had double his bases. The extra two expansions at the end cost more resources than they had yet to gain, so really he was handicapped and still managed to murder me.
Erm... are you sure you attached the right replay? If you did, did you actually watch the replay
at all? This game was NEVER 2 base P vs 3 base Z, you basically took the 3rd bases at the same time. (since all you did with the fast spire was to kill his sairs, but you didnt push with hydras, let alone contain with lurkers, he just walked out and took a 3rd on the left with cannons.) The shortly after he even killed your 3rd, then it was 3P vs 2Z bases, then you took an other base, but the time you get up your 4th, he was already at almost 5.
I'm sorry, but:
He had a bigger economy.
And he was always around 40 supply ahead of you, and you rarely bothered his troops, he could reach critical mass, and his templars were full of energy. But all in all, it was just a straight economic win. Even if he microed his battles worse then you (which he didnt), you didnt have a chance on the long run with the given number of bases, at any point in the game.